https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2017.476

Obiezione vostro onore. Un problematico consensus statement sull'obiezione di coscienza sanitaria / Objection your honor. A problematic consensus statement on healthcare conscientious objection

V. 66 N. 1 (2017)
Ricevuto: marzo 15, 2017
Accettato: marzo 15, 2017
Pubblicato: marzo 15, 2017
Obiezione di coscienza, diritti, democrazia / Conscientious objection, rights, democracy
Abstract Views: 815
PDF: 13
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Autori

Claudio Sartea
claudio.sartea@uniroma2.it
Dipartimento di Diritto Pubblico, Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", Roma, Italy.
Il saggio prende le mosse da un recente "consensus statement" elaborato da un gruppo di bioeticisti di prevalenza anglosassone ove la critica all'obiezione di coscienza è dura e sistematica. Vengono evidenziate le debolezze argomentative di questa posizione soprattutto nella prospettiva giuridica in cui l'istituto va opportunamente collocato.
----------
The essay begins from a view to a recent "consensus statement" prepared by a group of bioethicists, in prevalence Anglo-Saxon, in which the criticism to the conscientiuos objection is harsh and systematic. Argumentative weaknesses of this position are highlighted especially in the legal perspective in which the institution is appropriately placed.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Come citare

Sartea, C. (2017). Obiezione vostro onore. Un problematico consensus statement sull’obiezione di coscienza sanitaria / Objection your honor. A problematic consensus statement on healthcare conscientious objection. Medicina E Morale, 66(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2017.476

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.

An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:

  1. the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
  2. a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.