https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2016.464

Corporeità e qualità dell'abitare tra etica ed ecologia / Corporeity and quality of living between ethics and ecology

V. 65 N. 6 (2016)
Ricevuto: dicembre 16, 2016
Accettato: dicembre 16, 2016
Pubblicato: dicembre 20, 2016
casa, domesticità, ecologia umana, psicologia ambientale / home, domesticity, human ecology, environmental psychology
Abstract Views: 959
PDF: 2
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Autori

Maria Teresa Russo
mariateresa.russo@uniroma3.it
Dipartimento di Scienze della Formazione, Università Roma Tre, Roma, Italy.
L'antropologia filosofica sviluppatasi nella prima metà del XX secolo ha tematizzato in particolare la questione del rapporto tra uomo e ambiente, sottolineando le specificità della modalità umana di abitare il mondo. Abitare rappresenta una struttura antropologica che fa riferimento non soltanto alla capacità tecnica dell'uomo, ma soprattutto alla sua esistenza incarnata e all'esigenza di radicamento e di relazione, che trovano un'espressione privilegiata nella categoria della casa. Si tratta di un tema su cui oggi si confrontano vari saperi: la psicologia ambientale, l'architettura, la sociologia, per citarne solo alcuni. L'articolo analizza la funzione ma anche le nuove criticità dello spazio-casa e del correlato assetto urbano nello sviluppo e nell'espressione dell'identità personale e relazionale, nonchè nella promozione di uno stile di vita sostenibile. Data la diretta interrelazione tra spazio domestico, spazi urbani e comportamento umano, la qualità dell'abitare riguarda direttamente la bioetica, come ambito di quella "ecologia umana" inseparabile dalla riflessione sui significati dei comportamenti e sulle categorie di identità e qualità della vita, che implicano un èthos condiviso.
----------
The philosophical anthropology which had developed in the first half of the 20th century has focused in particular on the question of the relationship between man and environment, underlining the specific human modality of living in the world. Living represents an anthropological structure which refers not only to human technical capacity but above all to his incarnate existence and to the need of roots and relationship, which find a privileged expression in the category of the home. This argument is confronted today by various knowledges: environmental psychology, architecture, sociology, just to mention some of them. The article analyzes the function but also the new critical situations of space/home and of the related urban planning within the development and expression of personal and relational identity, as well as within the promotion of a sustainable lifestyle. Considering the direct interrelation between domestic space, urban spaces and human behavior, the quality of living is straightly bound to bioethics, as being the field of that "human ecology" which is inseparable from reflecting on the sense of ways of behavior and on the categories of identity and quality of life which imply a common èthos.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Come citare

Russo, M. T. (2016). Corporeità e qualità dell’abitare tra etica ed ecologia / Corporeity and quality of living between ethics and ecology. Medicina E Morale, 65(6). https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2016.464

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.

An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:

  1. the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
  2. a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.