https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2009.228

L'Ordinanza del Tribunale di Bologna (29 giugno 2009) in tema di diagnosi genetica preimpianto nel contesto della giurisprudenza sulla Legge 40/2004

V. 58 N. 6 (2009)
Pubblicato: dicembre 30, 2009
Diagnosi gentica preimpianto, procreazione medicalmente assistita, embrione umano / Pre-implantation genetic screening, medically assisted procreation, human embryo
Abstract Views: 596
PDF: 3
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Autori

Marina Casini
marina.casini@rm.unicatt.it
Ricercatore, Italy.
Emma Traisci
Dottoranda di ricerca, Istituto di Bioetica, Facoltà di Medicina e chirurgia "A. Gemelli", Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
Silvia Bosio
Dottoranda di ricerca, Istituto di Bioetica, Facoltà di Medicina e chirurgia "A. Gemelli", Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy.
L'Ordinanza del Tribunale di Bologna in tema di procreazione medicalmente assistita rappresenta una triste tappa della riflessione giuridica e della prassi medica. Essa infatti autorizza la diagnosi genetica preimpianto sugli embrioni umani contribuendo allo scardinamento della Legge 40 del 2004. Il presupposto di tale decisione risiede sia in una precedente contraddittoria giurisprudenza ordinaria e amministrativa in materia, sia sulla sentenza costituzionale n. 151 del 2009. E' quest'ultima, infatti, per la natura dell'organo e per la portata delle sue decisioni, che più di ogni altra pronuncia ha vanificato l'apprezzabile sforzo della Legge 40 di tutelare i diritti del concepito. Per questo, concludono gli Autori non c'è che da rafforzare il punto più indebolito: il riconoscimento generale del concepito come soggetto, in vista del quale sarebbe fortemente auspicabile la modifica dell'articolo 1 del Codice civile.
----------
The Bolognese Court's ordinance on the medically assisted procreation represents a sad stage of the legal reflection and of medicine. In fact, it allows the preimplantation genetic screening on human embryos, leading to in the unhinging of the Law 40/2004. The assumption of such decision is based both on a contradictory ordinary and administrative case-law and on the constitutional decision n. 151 of 2009. In fact, it made the appreciable effort of the Law 40 to protect the rights of new borns fruitless, because of its nature and the importance of its decisions. For this reason, according to the Authors, the weal point has to be reinforced: the general acknowledgment of new born subject, for which changing the article 1 of the Civil Code would be strongly desirable.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Come citare

Casini, M., Traisci, E., & Bosio, S. (2009). L’Ordinanza del Tribunale di Bologna (29 giugno 2009) in tema di diagnosi genetica preimpianto nel contesto della giurisprudenza sulla Legge 40/2004. Medicina E Morale, 58(6). https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2009.228

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.

An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:

  1. the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
  2. a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.