https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.1997.888
An evaluation of the European's Community's "Convention on human rights and biomedicine"
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The article concerns the recent "Conventon on human rights and biomedicine" drawn up by the European Community's Bioethics Commission and approved by the Committee of European Ministers in November 1996.
Since the approved text will be completed by protocols which explain the principles stated in the Convention, the author provides a brief history of the document and analyses the reasons why it was drafted, the general creteria adopted and the main ethical principles which inspired it.
The analysis of the Convention attempts to answer the following questions: how should the Convention's contents be evaluated? Which ethical principles and criteria do the Convention's proposals correspond to? And finally, which aspects concern the obligations of the partecipating countries and the control mechanisms, and what are the reservations and interpretations of this international instrument?
Briefly, the last part of the paper can be summarized as follows: 1. certain points in the text of the Convention are valuable (like the claim for the need to protect the human being, which remains a priority with respect to the interest of society) and others are questionable (like, for example, the protection of prenatal life, the assisted fertilization techniques, assistence for the dying, etc.); 2. the Convention goes back to the ethical principles of active, technological and experimental medicine, which are present in the English speaking world, described as "principlism"; 3. procedures which aim to guarantee the fulfilment of the contents of the Convention are established, although during ratification, the member countries can express reservations if a law in force in their country is not in conformity with the Convention's dispositions.
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.