Las espaldas de los mèdicos son anchas, ma non troppo
Published: August 30, 2010
Abstract Views: 375
PDF (Italiano): 0
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Catedrático de Medicina Legal, Académico de Número de la Real Academia de Medicina
de Andalucía Oriental, Italy.
----------
The article takes into consideration the controversial aspects of the new Abortion Law in Spain (to be implemented 05.07.10) using the Declarations of the Spanish Health Minister about how will the new Law resolve the matter of consent in under-age women, aged 16 and 17 years old if they choose not to inform their parents of their decision of having an abortion. The New Law means a total change from the previous one as it defines the abortion as a Right for women. The New Abortion Law states that women have the right to have an abortion in a public hospital before the 14th week. The former Law from 1985 decriminalized abortion in three cases: ethical abortion, when the pregnancy was the result of rape; eugenic, when there was the assumption of serious malformations and congenital problems in the foetus; and therapeutical, when there was a life threat or any danger to the physical or psychical health of the mother. In addition to these the voluntary interruption of a pregnancy was subjected to time frames: 12 and 22 weeks for ethical and eugenic respectively and unlimited to therapeutical. The author of the article criticises the government's reasoning in order to change the existing law as well as the regulations of the Right of Conscientious Objection to the performance of an abortion by doctors. The article draws attention also to one of the most controversial aspects of this new law, passed without social or political consensus: the right of under- age women to have an abortion without informing and getting the consent of their parents or legal tutors, if these young women declare that getting permission could represent a problem in the relationship within the family. The new law makes doctors responsible of investigating the truth behind the alleged family conflict when they are approached by a case without paternal consent. The author of the article critically points out the role of "policemen" given to doctors forced to investigate personal circumstances of completely unknown adolescents that come to them with the intention of having an abortion. This is not a medical act and doctors can not be burdened by this kind of responsibility.
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.