The moral responsibility of scientists: overview of contemporary epistemological conceptions

Published: April 7, 1989
Abstract Views: 15
PDF: 1
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The increasing refinement of instruments of investigation has enabled man to probe ever wider and deeper areas of the nature around him, offering him, at the same time, the possibility of intervening in events and directing knowledge toward desired ends. However, these possibilities conceal within them certain risks, precisely at the moment when they become realizable: this is because the element that more than any other differentiates human beings from all other natural beings comes into play: freedom, from which responsibility flows; but what does responsibility mean? In what forms does it present itself? Who can be called responsible and for what? Here are the basic questions to start with.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Mongiano, D. M. (1989). The moral responsibility of scientists: overview of contemporary epistemological conceptions. Medicina E Morale, 39(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.1989.1272