https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.1997.862
Medicine and death
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Death has had a central position in medicine in every age, but its history shows that physicians' engagement to fight for life at any cost is a peculiarity of modern scientific progress. On the other hand, in the transition of a society characterized by traditional values into a modern society, historians observe profound changes in the relationship between man and death.
While culture dominated by the religious tradition accepted death as a limit of man and an integral part of the human condition, although it still protected life, the modern culture, in its anxiety to dominate the world, has removed and fights death. Therefore only interventions aimed at re-establishing human and moral values in the education of the physician can give a meaning to the practice of medicine, that fully reflects the ideology and values of a society dominated by technology and science.
Technological progress has provided physicians with the means to save human lives, but without human and moral values, those very means can cause the protraction of the dying person's agony. Technological progress seems to come back against man.
The bioethical debate aims to re-establish the dignity of death, but it has come to a standstill on the heart-rending problem of euthanasia. The authors believe that this situation is dangerous and in fact in this period of limited economic resources, the decisions regarding life and death are being conditioned by economic evaluations.
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.