https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2001.736
Criminal Law facing with illness.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The role of the consent is discussed in comparison to the juridical and criminal qualification of the medical/surgical treatment. It sustains that the principle of self-determination cannot constitute the only indicative criterion to resolve the emergent ethical and juridical issues in biomedicine today, because the danger of a contractualistic and defensive medicine would rise and medicine itself would be conceived not as (human) science, but as mere technical skill.
In this sense, different situations in which the consent is impossible or inadequate are underlined. The Author shows that the comparison, to define convergences on the fundamental factors for the guardianship of the human dignity - and therefore to define shared guidelines in particular fields of human activity -, is co-essential to the modern concept of democracy.
Particularly, pertinent motivations are developed also in a secular and pluralistic social context with the purpose to maintain the juridical prohibition of the euthanasia both active and passive, in the optics of a solidaristic approach to the suffering. This approach would be compromised from a favourable normative law to the euthanasia. In this sense, an intrinsic limit to the law is determined in the impossibility to legally authorise a physician-patient relationship played upon the death.
Of course, the matter of the euthanasia is held separate from the issues regarding the therapeutic obstinacy and the proportionality of a medical intervention. A specific investigation is devoted to the interpretation of the art. 32, the 2nd paragraph, of the Italian Constitution, with respect to the permanent juridical validity of the principle of unavailability of the human life.
They are also considered issues concerning the incompetent subjects, the role of the norm under necessity, the assignments of the institutional review boards (also with respect to the responsibility of the members) and the necessity of new juridical models to the prevention of the "adverse" medical events.
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.