https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2001.733
Considerations on Ministerial Regulation of Ethics Committees in Italy. The experience of CEIOC in Brescia.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
This article takes into consideration the recent ministerial regulation about the constitution and the operativity of ethics committees (ECs). The ministerial decrees are object of critical analysis: the remarks regard in particular the exclusive feature of attention of the ministerial decrees on the clinical experimentations, the excess of bureaucratization introduced into the work of the ethics committees, the non-acknowledgment of the ECs of the private institutes, the insufficient clearness as to the responsibility of ECs members.
The problematic aspects underscored in the ministerial decrees can all be traced back to the topic of the very nature of ECs. The concern is that, due to bureaucratic tasks and legal terminologies, such organisms may lose their distinctiveness, i.e. the fact of operating inside the system of ethics, and not inside the system of the positive right or the one of the administrative-bureaucratic organization. It is underlined that the object of ECs discernment should be the ethical aspects connected to the decisions in the biomedical field, both when the committee deals with clinical praxis and when it examines research protocols: the constituent perspective of an ethics committee should be specifically the ethical one.
In conclusion, we put forward the experience of the EC of the catholic hospital institutions (CEIOC), established in 1989 on the initiative of the six catholic hospitals in Brescia (Italy). CEIOC is presented as an example of a local EC that has had to be conformed to the current regulations, both in an institutive modality and in its composition, and that has striven to keep its own original identity and to preserve, in continuity with the past, its more pertinent functions.
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.