https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2003.658
The weighted risk and relationship with patients: ambivalent aspect of medicine.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The physicians and their patients are under pressure so that the risk of future diseases is regularly assessed, and measures are applied for their primary and secondary prevention. The paper focuses some problems originated from this policy, addressing the reliability of the algorithms and the difficulty to reach the recommended objectives. This paper discusses, based on real data from an observational study, some ethical concerns relevant to population screening, to the systematic implementation of preventive measures as recommended in the guidelines, and more generally to the "culture of prevention".
The critical points discussed include the need to consider that the individual subject is not the average representative of the population, but an individual subject with unique characteristics, predicaments, and sensibility; the awareness that the prevention can be effective on the population but not necessarily in the individual subject; the consciousness that the objectives set to decrease the risk should actually be within real reach, involving the subject's autonomy-responsibility beyond the guidelines' recommendations; that reaching the objective does not necessarily mean a favourable outcome.
The paper also point to the insistence on preventive measures as expressing the loss of the sense of the limit to the right to life and to the safeguard of health, that is, an expression of the refusal of the meaning of illness and death.<7p>
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.