https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2003.656
2001-2002 Report on euthanasia praxis in The Netherlands: critical considerations.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
In June 2003, a third Report on the Dutch euthanasia practice has been published. The end of this investigation was to see whether medical doctors respect the regulations regarding euthanasia. From 1998 all cases of euthanasia and assisted suicide have to be reported by physicians to Regional Commissions for the Review of Euthanasia. This procedure has been maintained in the "Law for the Review of Termination of Life at Request and of Assisted Suicide" (2001), which implies that euthanasia and medically assisted suicide are legal, provided that the physician has respected a number of requirements of due care. One of these requirements is that the medical doctor reports cases of euthanasia and assisted suicide.
It appears that, though the percentage of reported cases of euthanasia and assisted suicide has increased from 41% in 1995 to 54% in 2001, the total number of cases reported tends to decrease from 2000. The number of cases of termination of life without a request has remained unchanged in 2001/2002. Because medical doctors do hardly report these cases, the social control of it is impossible. Many cases of intentional termination of life are concealed as cases of terminal sedation.
Moreover, it is the question whether the 13% of deaths in which a therapy has not been continued or started with the explicit intention of accelerating death, is not ethically equivalent to intentional termination of life. Therefore, the euthanasia praxis in Holland does not appear to be transparent, whereas this was the end of legalizing it.
A significant fact is that the introduction of palliative care (PC) in Holland took place quite lately (during the second part of the nineties of XX century), the introduction of euthanasia on the other hand early (during the seventies). Medical doctors who function as consultants in euthanasia cases, have observed that the frequency of requests for euthanasia have diminished considerably after the introduction of PC. The conclusion is that the application of PC is the best guarantee of dealing carefully with the end of life and an antidote against euthanasia on demand.
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.