https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2004.645
The concept of person between bioethics and biolaw.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The article argues about the concept of person, underlining the central role of this notion in bioethical issues in the last years. Really, the ways of interpretation the concept are various.
In the context of actual debate, it is possible to recognise two opposite orientations to conceive the person. On the one hand, we have the "reductionist" vision (the human being is not always person; indeed, sometimes person is also the not human being); on the other hand, the "personalist" one (that support the identity among person and human being).
The Author stops on the critical analysis of reductionist orientation, in its turn constituted by different bioethical and biojuridical theories, concluding that the notion of person - that was philosophically elaborated to characterise the human being - risks to be used against man himself, creating dangerous forms of "discrimination".
The articles concludes with some reflections that support the theoretical choice to recognise an intrinsic dignity (ethics) and strong rights (law) to every human being, who have a personal statute from the conception until his death. In this way, a bio-law "for" the man is called to not be "neutral", but to take sides in favour of the protection and guardianship of the human being in all the circumstances, also when he is not able to claim his rights (e.g.: embryo and patient in persistent vegetative state).
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.