Bioethical perspectives of neurostimulation.

Published: December 31, 2004
Abstract Views: 210
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Neurostimulation and neuromodulation, through subcortical implantation of electrodes, appears to be converting itself in one the most promising branches of neurosurgery. A great number of new therapeutic indications are joining the traditional ones related to Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders: from impaired consciousness to pain-therapy, from epilepsy to neuropsychiatric pathologies.

A comparison between these new techniques and the problematic experience of "classical" psychosurgery shows at least one positive and momentous difference, i.e. the reversibility of Deep Brain Stimulation effects. But artificial "modulation" of the nervous system means in one sense "modulation" of the human mind: not only a treatment, but in some way a test of its limits, a development, a transformation.

Such a manipulating power applied to the distinctive nucleus of the human person needs a very careful ethical consideration not only of the existing applications of this technology, but also of its future potentialities. So far, only sporadic, though interesting, ethical reflections have been dedicated to this issue, mainly from the very neuroscientists engaged in the challenge. This article tries to offer the necessary elements to start a deep bioethical reflection on the subject, which in view of the mentioned reasons seems to be rather pressing.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Borghi, L. (2004). Bioethical perspectives of neurostimulation. Medicina E Morale, 53(6), 1203–1214. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2004.624