https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2020.605
Clinical trials and appropriateness of information verification
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
In evaluating experimental protocols, Territorial Ethics Committees pay careful attention to the "Information Sheet" (in abbreviation: IS) to be submitted to patients, in order to verify its effectiveness and correctness of formulation, to the end of obtaining patients' declaration of awareness, and unequivocal, free self-determination to participate in the proposed trials. It should be noted, however, that frequently the IS is drawn up with technical term and therefore not only is it inappropriate, but, in case of damages, it also appears as a sort of "waiver" of liability both for the investigator and for the sponsor, rather than an instrument of effective protection of patients. In this context, a statistical-cognitive survey was conducted on the data of the Ethics Committee of the University of Naples Federico II, concerning 1076 research protocols they examined in the period from 2012 to 2016. The survey showed that, also due to the widespread incidence of defensive medicine, the IS given to patients in profit- type protocols consisted of an average number of pages considerably higher than that of the no-profit clinical trials. This is a considerably important observation since the prolixity of the ISs - which sometimes are even longer than 40 pages - and their frequent lexical obscurity contrast with the message of essential clarity, which a free and conscious participation in the experimental trial must be based upon. Therefore, the activity carried out by Territorial Ethics Committees is strongly appreciated, as they play, among others, the irreplaceable role of guaranteeing the as-high-as-possible comprehensibility of the IS, precisely to protect patients' right to decision-making autonomy, also in the delicate matter of clinical trials.
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.