Il dibattito in Biogiuridica - Nota giuridica sulla necessaria integrazione del foglietto illustrativo dei prodotti farmaceutici contenenti ulipristal acetato (UPA) e levonorgestrel (LNG) (nome commerciale: EllaOne e Norlevo) classificati come strumenti di "contraccezione d'emergenza" / The debate in Biolaw - Legal note on the necessary integration of the information leaflet about drug containing ulipristal acetate (UPA) and levonorgestrel (LNG) (brand name: EllaOne and Norlevo) classified as tool for "emergency contraception"

Abstract Views: 798
PDF (Italiano): 11
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Non disponibile / Not available

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Casini, C. (2016). Il dibattito in Biogiuridica - Nota giuridica sulla necessaria integrazione del foglietto illustrativo dei prodotti farmaceutici contenenti ulipristal acetato (UPA) e levonorgestrel (LNG) (nome commerciale: EllaOne e Norlevo) classificati come strumenti di "contraccezione d’emergenza" / The debate in Biolaw - Legal note on the necessary integration of the information leaflet about drug containing ulipristal acetate (UPA) and levonorgestrel (LNG) (brand name: EllaOne and Norlevo) classified as tool for "emergency contraception". Medicina E Morale, 65(4), 495–507. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2016.481