https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2014.48

Hacia una retórica propositiva para la bioètica

Vol. 63 No. 4 (2014)
Published: August 30, 2014
Retorica, programmi di ricerca, tempo, libertà, dolore / Rhetoric, research programs, time, freedom, pain
Abstract Views: 464
PDF (Italiano): 0
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Alfredo Marcos
amarcos@fyl.uva.es
Catedrático de Filosofía de la Ciencia, Universidad de Valladolid, Spain.
La retorica si configura come una tecnica di comunicazione e persuasione, e in quanto tale può essere impiegata al servizio della verità o della manipolazione. E' perfettamente legittimo, se non necessario, impiegare le tecniche migliori di comunicazione al servizio di quello che ciascuno ritiene vero, buono e bello. Quelli che sono convinti della verità, bontà e bellezza delle bioetica di ispirazione cristiana hanno il compito di cercare la miglior strategia retorica per comunicarla. E' mia opinione che la bioetica di ispirazione cristiana abbia insistito molto nella linea di una retorica critica e di risposta, ma abbia investito troppo poco in chiave costruttiva e propositiva. Questo ha generato l'impressione che la bioetica di ispirazione cristiana costituisca - in termini del filosofo Lakatos - un "programma di ricerca regressivo", che, pur rispondendo bene alle critiche, non propone nulla. Per tale motivo nel dibattito contemporaneo la bioetica cristiana soffre la mancanza di iniziativa positiva. Nel presente articolo intendo sviluppare questa idea. A tal fine, dopo una riflessione introduttiva sulla natura della retorica (sezione 1), proseguo segnalando alcuni punti particolarmente importanti per la comunicazione in bioetica: la retorica del tempo (sezione 2), della libertà (sezione 3) e del dolore (sezione 4). Nella conclusione propongo infine una riflessione sulla possibilità di una retorica progressiva al servizio della bioetica di ispirazione cristiana (sezione 5).
----------
Rhetoric is a technique of communication and persuasion. As such, it may be employed at the service of truth or manipulation. It is perfectly legitimate, or even necessary, to use the best techniques of communication to honestly serve what you believe is true, good and beautiful. Those who are convinced of the truth, goodness and beauty of a Christian-inspired bioethics, are committed to find the best rhetorical ways to communicate it. In my opinion, the Christian-inspired bioethics has placed great emphasis in the line of the fair critical responses, but it may have not cultivated so much the rhetoric of the constructive proposals. This fact could give the false impression that the Christian- inspired bioethics is - let's say it in Lakatos' terms - a "regressive research program"; that it responds correctly, but does not propose anything. Thus it suffers a lack of initiative in the realm of the current debates. This article tries to develop this idea. To do this, I start with a general reflection on the rhetoric (Section 1) and then point out some particularly sensitive topics for the communication of bioethics: the rhetoric of time (Section 2), freedom (Section 3) and suffering (Section 4). The text concludes with a reflection on the possibility of a progressive rhetoric for communicating a Christian-inspired bioethics (section 5).

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

How to Cite

Marcos, A. (2014). Hacia una retórica propositiva para la bioètica. Medicina E Morale, 63(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2014.48

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.

An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:

  1. the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
  2. a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.