https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2015.17

Un deber de conocer para ser autónomos? Focalizando la atención en la autonomía personal en el derecho a no saber la información genètica?

Vol. 64 No. 4 (2015)
Published: August 30, 2015
Asesoría genética, derecho a no saber, pruebas genéticas, autonomía personal, ignorancia genética / Genetic counseling, right not to know, genetic tests, personal autonomy, genetic ignorance
Abstract Views: 579
PDF (Italiano): 2
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Yordanis Enríquez Canto
yenriquez@ucss.edu.pe
Doctor en Bioética, Prof. Auxiliar de Metodología de la Investigaciòn Científica, Departamento de Investigaciòn, Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Catòlica Sedes Sapientiae, Lima, Peru.
En el debate bioètico el desafío a la noción de autonomía personal, respecto al acceso a la información genètica, se evidencia cuando se intenta dar sentido y proteger un interès en no saber. Tal debate se desarrolla en diversas áreas relacionadas con el uso de la información genètica, sin embargo el presente trabajo se focaliza en el contexto de la asesoría genètica. Una de las tesis centrales de este debate propone en primer lugar, que el derecho a no conocer la propia condición genètica no aumenta el valor de la autonomía individual, sino que lo degrada y, segundo, que una ignorancia deseada respecto a los resultados de las pruebas genèticas es culpable. El artículo constituye una respuesta a las tesis de Rosamond Rhodes y Rodolfo Vázquez. En esta propuesta se realiza una argumentación que sigue un doble esquema. El primero incluye un razonamiento contra aquellos que hacen uso de su derecho a no saber, afirmando que no se puede ser autónomo en las decisiones sin saber toda la información pertinente. El segundo tiene en cuenta la decisión de no saber en relación a otros individuos: concluyendo que la ignorancia genètica es irresponsable e incluso culpable. El objetivo del artículo es proponer, en su primera parte, algunas consideraciones críticas respecto a la díada: autonomía - necesidad de información; y en la segunda, realizar un análisis de la estrategia argumentativa que sostiene que la elección de no saber los resultados diagnósticos es una ignorancia incriminatoria.
----------
In the bioethical debate regarding access to genetic information, the challenge to the notion of personal autonomy is evident when attempting to make sense of and to protect a patient's interest in not knowing. Such a debate takes place in various areas related to the use of genetic information, however the present work focuses on the context of genetic counseling. One of the main theses in this debate suggests first that the right not to know one's genetic condition does not increase the value of individual autonomy, but rather degrades it and, second, that a desired ignorance of the results of genetic testing is guilty. The article is a response to the arguments of Rosamond Rhodes and Rodolfo Vázquez. The thesis proposes an argumentation that follows a double outline. The first includes an argument against those who exercise their right not to know, stating that one cannot make autonomous decisions without knowing all the relevant information. The second takes into account the decision of not knowing related to other individuals, concluding that a person who chooses genetic ignorance is irresponsible and even guilty. The purpose of the paper is to first suggest some critical considerations regarding the dyad need of information-autonomy, while secondly proposing an analysis of the theoretical framework that argues that the choice of not knowing the diagnostic results is an incriminating ignorance.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

How to Cite

Canto, Y. E. (2015). Un deber de conocer para ser autónomos? Focalizando la atención en la autonomía personal en el derecho a no saber la información genètica?. Medicina E Morale, 64(4). https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2015.17

PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.

An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:

  1. the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
  2. a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.