https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2023.1252
Rethinking the concept of "end-of-life decisions": the bioethical contribution of the empirical studies ELDY and ELDY- CARE
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
This paper aims to critically investigate the notion of "End-of-Life Decisions" (ELDs) in order to extend its current semantic range. In fact, this expression usually refers to those practices that imply the death of the patient or those acts that can potentially shorten the patient's existence. Instead, we suggest including into the "end-of-life decisions" all the decisions made in the final phase of existence: killing (e.g., euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide), letting die (e.g., withholding or withdrawing treatments), keeping alive by any means, or keeping alive despite unfavorable prognosis (e.g., antibiotic therapy in an end-of-life subject with significant infection symptoms). Such an approach makes it possible to investigate ethical issues related to both practices that cause death or might affect the shortening of life and those aimed at procrastinating the fatal event. Following the conceptual analysis of the concept of ELDs, we discuss several empirical studies and the structure of questionnaires used in recent years to investigate end-of-life opinions and decisions among healthcare professionals, caregivers, and patients. In particular, we analyze the ELDY and ELDY-CARE studies, which are based on an extended concept of ELDs and thus focus not only on the anticipation of the death of the patient, but also on life-prolonging decisions.
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.