https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2023.1248
Improving equity in the kidney transplant continuum for non-European-born patients living in Italy: preliminary case-series findings of the contribution of pre-transplant ethical assessments
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
The care of migrants pursuing kidney transplant (KT) is emergent in Europe. Studies emphasize the ethical duty to adopt a holistic approach to these patients to enable the identification of modifiable risk factors and provide tailored interventions to prevent inequities. The ethical challenge at the time of pre-transplant evaluations is to determine - and balance - the prospective benefit of KT for individual patients (beneficence/non-maleficence) and all candidates pursuing KT (justice), without disrespecting persons (autonomy). This case-series study aims to explore the contribution of ethical assessments - by means of clinical ethics consultation - to pre-transplant evaluations for the prevention of inequities in KT, and to determine the limitations of standardized tools for pre-transplant psychosocial evaluations in non-European- born populations living in Italy. A case-series of first-generation immigrant patients enrolled for KT was analyzed using the Four-Boxes Method to explore the ethical dimensions of individual cases, and the Stanford Integrated Psychosocial Assessment for Transplant for psychosocial analyses. Ethical assessments allow identification of the individual and contextual features with the potential for detrimental impacts on equity in KT. Standardized tools do not consider the conditions associated with immigrant status which may affect the score and ability to tailor interventions to the patients' individual circumstances and disadvantage immigrant populations accordingly. This case-series study newly shows that ethical assessments may be a useful supplement to guide the examination of the ethical dimensions of individual clinical cases and to complement pre-transplant multidisciplinary evaluations, enabling a co-construction of the care process between individual patients and the transplant team. This approach shows potential to improve equity in KT care and to respect the principles of autonomy, beneficence/non-maleficence, and justice.
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.