https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2022.1215
Dialysis at the end of life: when is withdrawing ethically justified?
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Introduction: Chronic kidney disease is a significant cause of death. Those who progress to end-stage renal disease often start dialysis as a life-saving treatment. There are several ethical issues related to decision-making on withholding / withdrawing dialysis, particularly for patients with cognitive impairment and comorbidities, where the decision becomes more complex. Objective: The case of a 56-year-old patient, suffering from laryngeal cancer and end-stage chronic renal failure in three times a week hemodialysis treatment, as well as other comorbidities is analyzed. So, we want to deal with ethical aspects regarding the assessment of proportionality and ethical-clinical appropriateness of dialysis treatment in patients with a short-term prognosis and cognitive impairment. Discussion: Although in principle dialysis treatment, as a replacement treatment of renal function, has always a palliative purpose and is technically feasible, in some circumstances it could occur as an overtreatment and painful prolongation of the dying process. Conclusions: An interdisciplinary assessment and the patient's family involvement was important for assessing the clinical appropriateness and ethical proportionality of dialysis treatment. This assessment led to the development of a "Shared Document for Healthcare Ethics Planning". The objectives of care and the patient's good were identified within this document.
How to Cite
PAGEPress has chosen to apply the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0) to all manuscripts to be published.
An Open Access Publication is one that meets the following two conditions:
- the author(s) and copyright holder(s) grant(s) to all users a free, irrevocable, worldwide, perpetual right of access to, and a license to copy, use, distribute, transmit and display the work publicly and to make and distribute derivative works, in any digital medium for any responsible purpose, subject to proper attribution of authorship, as well as the right to make small numbers of printed copies for their personal use.
- a complete version of the work and all supplemental materials, including a copy of the permission as stated above, in a suitable standard electronic format is deposited immediately upon initial publication in at least one online repository that is supported by an academic institution, scholarly society, government agency, or other well-established organization that seeks to enable open access, unrestricted distribution, interoperability, and long-term archiving.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.