Contraception and natural rhythm methods: considerations

Published: February 28, 1990
Abstract Views: 164
PDF (Italiano): 0
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Recent considerations on contraception have arisen from an article which discusses natural rhythm methods, published by B. Haring, in 1976. After carefully examining the literature referred to by Haring, and in the light of recent research, the author underlines the fact that even today, natural rhythm methods are the only ones that do not interfere with the biological processes of the female sexual cycle. Moreover, the presumed risk of abortion caused by late fertilization, is an unfounded hypothesis that Haring proposed in 1976 to compare natural rhythm methods and contraceptive methods. The author's wish is that researchers respect woman in her integrity and that moralists do not let themselves be infiuenced by the material vision of life.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

D’Onofrio, F. (1990). Contraception and natural rhythm methods: considerations. Medicina E Morale, 39(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.1990.1189