Lights and shadows in the diagnosis of cerebral death

Published: April 30, 1991
Abstract Views: 149
PDF (Italiano): 0
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

In recent years the new organ transplantantion techniques, especially those applied to a beating heart, have raised many problems and particularly in assessing the reality of death. Brain death, with the following suspension of circulatory and respiratory functions, certainly appears to be the most reliable way to assess the end of life. There are stili conflicting opinions about the assessment of brain death at both cortical and spinal levels. Starting from these contradictory data reported in the literature, the author reviews the problem, focuslng in particular on the validity of EEG and other investigations related to the neurovegetative activity. The importance of transplantation is emphasized together with that of organ supply, but the importance of really assessing the end of all nervous activity at various cerebral levels is also stressed, with the final recommcndation that no subjcct can ever be considered a donor if there is some doubt about his brain activity.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

D’Onofrio, F. (1991). Lights and shadows in the diagnosis of cerebral death. Medicina E Morale, 40(1), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.1991.1148