Euthanasia in utilitarian bioethics. A critique of J Rachel's and H Kuhse's books.

Published: April 30, 1993
Abstract Views: 283
PDF (Italiano): 0
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

The Author examines the critiques presented by Rachels and Kuhse, two major scholars in Anglo-Saxon utilitarianism, to the sanctity-of-life doctrine, with particular reference to the problem of euthanasia. Both authors show a radical misunderstanding of the nature of ethics, basically due to the strictly consequentialist nature of their theory. Utilitarianism thus shows its inadequacies in picking up the morally relevant characters of the complex situations presented by terminai illness. The Author then shows how the traditional principles of the double effect and of the proportionality of the means allow a better interpretation of the concrete experience of moral action.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

How to Cite

Reichlin, M. (1993). Euthanasia in utilitarian bioethics. A critique of J Rachel’s and H Kuhse’s books. Medicina E Morale, 42(2), 331–361. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.1993.1068