The principle of therapeutic prudence. Beyond the ordinary-extraordinary and proportionate-disproportionate distinctions

  • Pablo Requena Meana | requena@pusc.it Facoltà di Teologia, Dipartimento di Teologia Morale, Pontificia Università della Santa Croce, Italy.

Abstract

Traditionally, the question of whether it is obligatory to use a particular therapeutic means was resolved by considering the use of ordinary therapeutic means as obligatory while the use of extraordinary therapeutic means was considered non-obligatory. Following criticism, this distinction has since shifted to the consideration of proportionate versus disproportionate therapeutic means as a way of resolving the question. In this article we intend to show that the two distinctions are not equivalent, and though necessary, are insufficient to qualify good medical action. Therapeutic prudence remains indispensable for identifying the best medical option for each patient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
2019-06-30
Section
Original Articles
Keywords:
ordinary means, proportionality of treatment, therapeutic prudence
Statistics
Abstract views: 56

PDF (Italiano): 6
Share it
How to Cite
Requena Meana, P. (2019). The principle of therapeutic prudence. Beyond the ordinary-extraordinary and proportionate-disproportionate distinctions. Medicina E Morale, 68(2), 125-139. https://doi.org/10.4081/mem.2019.578